Miami Defendant’s Appeal Highlights Jury Unanimity in Petit Theft Case

Petit theft charges may seem straightforward on the surface, but as a recent Miami case illustrates, complex legal questions can underlie even relatively minor alleged crimes. When a theft offense involves alternative acts as the means of commission, issues around jury unanimity requirements come into play with real implications for defendants.

The Incident

In July 2021, the defendant allegedly broke into the Miami apartment of his former girlfriend, demanding the return of his phone and wallet. After entering, the defendant allegedly snatched the victim’s purse, emptied its contents onto the floor, and proceeded to leave the premises with her phone, wallet, and medication in hand.

The defendant was subsequently arrested and faced six total criminal counts, including a petit theft charge of allegedly stealing the victim’s wallet and/or purse. 

The Trial and The Appeal

At trial, the court instructed jurors to determine whether the defendant stole “the purse or wallet” belonging to the victim. The word “or” became highly consequential. The defendant appealed his later conviction, centrally arguing that the jury should have unanimously agreed on whether he stole the specific purse, wallet, or both.

Without such specificity, he contended this generalized approach violated his constitutional right to a unanimous verdict. So, a key question emerged on appeal: In a petit theft case involving alternative acts as modes of commission, does unanimity apply to the specific act or the overall charge?

The Concept of Unanimity in Criminal Law

While Florida law has an absolute requirement for unanimous jury verdicts in criminal convictions, in its opinion, the appeals court followed the established legal principle that alternatives means cases are an exception. When distinct acts effectively make up means to the same criminal offense, unanimity applies to the charge itself rather than the specific underlying act.

So, in cases like this Miami petit theft allegation involving alternative acts, jurors could unanimously agree the defendant was guilty of theft without needing to isolate whether he stole the purse or wallet or both. The law recognizes those items as alternative methods of fulfilling the elements of one offense.

Expert Analysis: What the Appeals Court Ruled

The appeals court ultimately affirmed the conviction, ruling that no error occurred due to the lack of jury unanimity on the stolen item. The jury unanimously found the defendant guilty of petit theft, satisfying state law. Stealing the wallet and/or purse was considered a legally viable alternative act to support that unanimous conviction.

The ruling also drew upon federal and state precedents, similarly recognizing that when distinct acts make up means to a single crime, unanimity hinges on the charge itself rather than isolating one specific act. This distinction critically impacts petit theft defendants in Miami and statewide.

Why This Case Matters

While minor in scale compared to other felonies like grand theft, petit theft allegations can still carry severe penalties like hefty fines or even jail time in some circumstances. That’s especially true for repeat offenses. So, securing solid legal advice is critical if you are accused of a crime.

You Deserve Experienced Representation

This case shows that state law allows some flexibility in applying unanimity requirements to alternative-acts theft situations in Miami courtrooms. Understanding these nuances of the law can prove indispensable in building a successful legal defense. You need an experienced defense attorney on your side when you are facing prosecution.

CALL US NOW for a CONFIDENTIAL INITIAL CONSULTATION at (305) 538-4545, or take a moment to fill out our confidential and secure intake form.* The additional details you provide will greatly assist us in responding to your inquiry.

FILL OUT INTAKE FORM
*Due to the large number of people who contact our law office requesting our assistance, it is strongly suggested that you take the time to provide us with specific details regarding your case by filling out our confidential and secure intake form. The additional details you provide will greatly assist us in responding to your inquiry promptly and appropriately.

THERE ARE THOUSANDS OF LAW FIRMS AND ATTORNEYS IN SOUTH FLORIDA. ALWAYS INVESTIGATE A LAWYER’S QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE BEFORE MAKING A DECISION ON HIRING A CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEY ATTORNEY FOR YOUR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY CASE